Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760 DS3H AC DDR4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 DS3H AC DDR4  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:53
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$111
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 150
77% 124 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 297
33% 261 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8810) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 120
Parallax 126
111% 127 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 103
Splatting 89.2
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M450 500GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,276
Write 2,868
Mixed 1,799
449% 1,981 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 95.5
357% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 884
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 788
582% 772 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 341%
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB
198GB free
Firmware: STZSE015
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 481
Write 455
Mixed 444
103% 460 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 51.7
180% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 345
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Golden Empire CL18-20-20 D4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 36.3
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 24
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 29.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 31.5" 1280 720 HPN351A HP 32 Display
Typical GA-B760 DS3H AC DDR4 Builds (Compare 500 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 DS3H AC DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $456
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback