Today's hottest deals

Intel H81

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive13.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardIntel H81  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:53
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 323
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Gigabyte(1458 2404) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.5% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 60.7
Parallax 88
31% 62.3 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 24.4
41% 54.3 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 107 115 117 119 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
13.9% Very poor
Read 64.4
Write 47.5
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 111
16% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 4.1
15% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
164GB free
Firmware: ES12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 55 58 58 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 54.7
Write 49.3
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 56.1
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 60%
Sobetter Ext 320GB
140GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 9.2 12 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 101
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 11.1
22% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Mixed 0
381% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 6.9
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 44 60 7.2" 1920 1080 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical H81 Builds (Compare 2,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H81

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback