Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime513.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 20:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 565
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 39.8
33% 41.5 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 34.8
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X300 128GB-$170
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 282
Write 194
Mixed 184
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 28.2
97% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 143
133% 208 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 92%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 181 180 175 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 189
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 179
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 107%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-2400 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.5% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 14 0 32" 1280 720 BBY3536 NS-50D510NA17
Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $483
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback