HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88ED
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230725
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 15:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 214
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 610
60% 491 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 88ED) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 21
Parallax 29.9
8% 20 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 22.6
17% 19.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBA512TDV-1AZ1AABHA 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 943 880 610 580 473 458 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 977
Mixed 920
SusWrite 657
201% 896 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 38.9
129% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 476
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 536
373% 466 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 141%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 29
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 20 60 16" 1280 720 CMN160A
Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx Builds (Compare 2,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback