Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro Q670M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive517% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus Pro Q670M-C  (all builds)
Memory39.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221128
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 15:25
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900F-$308
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 70
1-Core 204
2-Core 406
116% 227 Pts
4-Core 799
8-Core 1,351
131% 1,075 Pts
64-Core 2,780
172% 2,780 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 110%
Great: 119%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
MSI(1462 5027) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 141
Parallax 238
98% 167 fps
MRender 230
Gravity 126
Splatting 194
150% 183 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1037 1819 3830 4187 4159 3747 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
517% Outstanding
Read 4217
Write 4,225
Mixed 3,014
SusWrite 3,130
820% 3,647 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 94.3
351% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,285
DQ Write 934
DQ Mixed 1,183
864% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 517%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot Memory (PDP Systems) PSD516G480081 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 51.7
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 49
SC Mixed 28.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 124%
This bench: 137%
Great: 166%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 27" 1280 720 ACR099C KA272U
Typical Pro Q670M-C Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro Q670M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback