Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 14:42
Run Duration511 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$152
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 261
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 715
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.3% Poor
Lighting 27.8
Reflection 36.9
Parallax 32.1
23% 32.3 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 24.1
24% 30.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 33%
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$280
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3790 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 129
Parallax 131
118% 135 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 100
Splatting 89.9
98% 125 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 439 344 170 123 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 468
Mixed 403
SusWrite 275
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 59.5
204% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$89
440GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 862 416 417 424 412 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 1,330
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 491
234% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 74.2
261% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 1004
768% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 205%
Great: 237%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
178GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 468 465 460 467 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 463
Mixed 321
SusWrite 466
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.3
165% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 151
166% 281 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 114%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
89GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 51 53 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 50.4
Write 50.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 52
35% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 51%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
365GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 111
Write 111
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 96.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 85%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 121 116 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
67% Good
Read 115
Write 120
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 119
71% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67%
Great: 106%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
244GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 69 67 68 68 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 73.1
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 67.6
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 62%
Asmt 2105 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 199 195 199 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 130
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 196
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
869GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 33
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 21.7
22% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 66%
WD Game Drive 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 193 196 191 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 226
Mixed 132
SusWrite 194
258% 192 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 1.5
332% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 118%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
357GB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 34.9
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 19.7
41% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.8
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 26 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24E1 VG248
Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback