Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '24 at 14:34
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 297
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 798
84% 670 Pts
64-Core 939
58% 939 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 265
Reflection 258
Parallax 279
216% 268 fps
MRender 311
Gravity 231
Splatting 173
188% 238 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 185%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,949
Write 1,928
Mixed 1,133
371% 1,670 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 49.5
167% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 875
DQ Write 1,066
DQ Mixed 938
716% 960 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Plextor PX-256M9PeGN 256GB
60GB free
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 249 259 239 253 268 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 176
Mixed 168
SusWrite 244
110% 513 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 45.7
165% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 309
240% 333 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 140%
Great: 211%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
743GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 149 145 142 146 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 170
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 144
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
432% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
276GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 124 125 125 125 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 123
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 38
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 36
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback