Dell Latitude E4310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E4310  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 04HKYP
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '18 at 03:34
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 147
56% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 190
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Dell(1028 0410) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2182
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 74.8
Write 66.9
Mixed 66.5
52% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.15
41% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 52%
WD My Passport 2TB
548GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 19.7
Mixed 19.5
27% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.21
72% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-G7 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E4310 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E4310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback