MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 18:34
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 86.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 346
108% 203 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,071
107% 872 Pts
64-Core 1,568
97% 1,568 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 260
Parallax 294
233% 280 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 238
Splatting 177
194% 247 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 196%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
197GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,336
Write 69
Mixed 131
315% 1,512 MB/s
4K Read 1,024
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 5.9
1,560% 344 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 95%
WDC WDBA3V0010BNC-WRSN 1TB
866GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,597
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,432
357% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 78.7
282% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,323
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 1,123
844% 1,136 MB/s
Poor: 157% Great: 274%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: 40101000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,519
Write 68.3
Mixed 133
810% 3,907 MB/s
4K Read 1,032
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 6.4
1,574% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 122%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
234GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,551
Write 69.5
Mixed 134
813% 3,918 MB/s
4K Read 1035
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 7.3
1,580% 349 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: S0905C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11487
Write 76.8
Mixed 148
810% 3,904 MB/s
4K Read 1,020
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 9.2
1,560% 345 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 191%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
159GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11,423
Write 68.7
Mixed 134
804% 3,876 MB/s
4K Read 1,025
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 7
1,565% 346 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
238GB free
Firmware: DXM04B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,793
Write 69.5
Mixed 134
416% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 1,026
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 8.4
1,568% 346 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 36.4
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.3
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 13 144 29.5" 1280 720 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $679
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback