MSI AGDL-CCME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 153%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive493% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star PSGK-IKBQ
MotherboardMSI AGDL-CCME  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 16:55
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$78
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 273
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 831
83% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,038
64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 232C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 254
Parallax 532
199% 344 fps
MRender 416
Gravity 211
Splatting 330
260% 319 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 196%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4230 4245 3303 1610 1781 1618 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
493% Outstanding
Read 3,996
Write 4,503
Mixed 3,261
SusWrite 2,798
820% 3,640 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 96
340% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,332
988% 1,307 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 493%
Great: 573%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 156 156 156 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 113
Mixed 105
SusWrite 155
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM2666HLG-16GK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 23.3
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 27.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2WG3-
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback