MSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 258%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C60
MotherboardMSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)  (all builds)
Memory243.9 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200515
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '24 at 00:26
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3970X-$1,900
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 61.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
88% 170 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 1135
101% 852 Pts
64-Core 5,925
367% 5,925 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 222
Reflection 209
Parallax 265
181% 232 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 222
Splatting 161
172% 218 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin Striker 960GB-$336
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 361 351 395 392 303 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 462
Write 408
Mixed 335
SusWrite 366
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 25.1
82% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 82.7
94% 160 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 112%
Mushkin Reactor 512GB-$280
422GB free
Firmware: O0821D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 346 346 348 347 343 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 469
Write 340
Mixed 286
SusWrite 346
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 22.7
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 96.3
80% 117 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 108%
Mushkin MKNSSDPE2TB-D8 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 42A2S8MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1985 1957 2004 1964 1503 1736 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
330% Outstanding
Read 2,495
Write 2,026
Mixed 1,557
SusWrite 1858
445% 1,984 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 78
258% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 896
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 580
495% 730 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 330%
Great: 382%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 159 158 157 165 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 130
Write 149
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 159
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
265% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW128GX4M4E3200C16 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 47.6
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 52.2
130% 45.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 30
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 115%
Great: 275%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 60 27.9" 2560 1417 AUS28BA ASUS VG289
Typical TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback