Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 23:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 145
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 901
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
ASRock(1849 5241) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 135
Parallax 289
112% 187 fps
MRender 239
Gravity 147
Splatting 201
160% 196 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
560GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1712 1675 1799 1675 1765 1822 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 1,767
Mixed 1,304
SusWrite 1,741
372% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 37.7
162% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 577
506% 747 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 263%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FXU8G1M3200C16X2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 35
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 31.1
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0549 XF270HU
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback