HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 86D3
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200526
Uptime	17.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '24 at 22:11
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Memory 74.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 249 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 802 79% 645 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.9% Above average	Lighting 70.2 Reflection 81.1 Parallax 72.7 57% 74.7 fps	MRender 75.9 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 63.4 56% 69.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 132 128 118 114 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 420 Write 151 Mixed 182 SusWrite 123 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 23.6 90% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 47.7 DQ Mixed 84.7 84% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB 266,123 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 346GB free Firmware: 2AR20002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 79 78 77 78 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston XJ69DF-MIE2 2x8GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72% Very good	MC Read 30.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 28.7 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 27.4 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	53	60	21.5"	1280 720	ELE0000 ELEFW2217M

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	562x
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	489x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	218x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	364x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	256x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	198x

SSD
SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TBIntelBench 183%, 4,172 samples	270x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	104x
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	67x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	411x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	286x
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	164x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $876

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16