Asus PRIME A520M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-K  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 20:06
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 81.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 882
94% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 59.5
Parallax 74.9
0% 44.8 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 61
Splatting 44.5
44% 55 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 15%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Faspeed K7-256G-CD 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7 102 4.4 94 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 512
Write 359
Mixed 339
SusWrite 38.6
69% 312 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.4
55% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 76%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
184GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 76 77 77 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 207
Write 13.7
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 76.6
58% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
312GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 103
Write 107
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 95.9
123% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JAD3200U1816 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 33.3
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 33
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 52 60 32" 1920 1017 MST0030 CONDOR
Typical PRIME A520M-K Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback