Acer Aspire A515-51G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-51G  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Charmander_KL
Memory6.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime13.8 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 11:35
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BRN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 87.3
44% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 226
24% 190 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Acer(1025 119A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5123
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 17.4
15% 19 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 15.7
13% 15.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 1TB
716GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP615PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 362 380 374 334 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 62% 16 149 30 60 15.5" 1536 841 BOE0687
Typical Aspire A515-51G Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-51G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback