HP ZBook 17 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 842D
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 22:16
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2186M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 200
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 604
57% 471 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P3200
HP(103C 842D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2919
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 42.8
47% 44.7 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 64.3
Splatting 60.4
39% 44.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
855GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 336
Mixed 338
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 41.2
104% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
M.2 512GB 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R840H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 354
Write 372
Mixed 323
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 27.6
91% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 98.7
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 163
131% 178 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x768A] LD4AS016G-3200ST 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 21.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN175A
Typical ZBook 17 G5 Builds (Compare 709 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback