Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime6 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 22:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 570
67% 519 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 50.8
46% 54.6 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 49.7
44% 54.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD240GM7B 240GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0317A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 12 271 13 152 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 466
Write 251
Mixed 334
SusWrite 141
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 25
97% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 46.9
77% 142 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
665GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 176 173 175 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 185
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 176
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH56AA# 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 24: 0P 2R 3G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
24% 29% 35 213 59 60 23.8" 1920 1080 BNQ78E7 BenQ GW2480
Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,743 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback