Asrock Z590-C/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 188%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z590-C/ac  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 16:35
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900K-$254
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 165
2-Core 337
99% 191 Pts
4-Core 597
8-Core 1,033
99% 815 Pts
64-Core 1,497
93% 1,497 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Lighting 301
Reflection 256
Parallax 302
245% 286 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 242
Splatting 176
194% 248 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 203%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 1TB
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3005 3204 2564 2520 1436 664 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,416
Write 3,597
Mixed 2,558
SusWrite 2,232
612% 2,701 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.2
246% 86.9 MB/s
DQ Read 905
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 872
624% 805 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 344%
Great: 507%
Amd-raid WDC WD102PURZ-85 10TB
669GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 126 125 126 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 163
Mixed 100
SusWrite 126
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1.7
365% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 140%
Seagate ST18000VE002-3BS101 18TB
1TB free
Firmware: EV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 187 184 189 186 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST18000VE002-3BS101 18TB
1TB free
Firmware: EV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 162 165 167 166 163 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate ST18000NE000-2YY101 18TB
1TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 187 187 187 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 93%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
10.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 185 189 183 181 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 194
Mixed 158
SusWrite 185
247% 182 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.9
406% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 6.5
DQ Mixed 1
257% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 33.5
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 34" 1280 720 HPN36FA HP P34hc G4
Typical Z590-C/ac Builds (Compare 2,346 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z590-C/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $874
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback