Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Indio
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 15:18
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 106
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 174
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 4
Parallax 7.3
0% 3.83 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50
183GB free
Firmware: X61110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 198 204 183 194 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 203
Write 194
Mixed 188
SusWrite 198
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 22.3
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 156
120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 63 49 62 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 36.5
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 59.7
42% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 62%
WD easystore 2648 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1 1 1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 1
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Mixed 0
224% 20.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U8G-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM SDRAM 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 13.8
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 46 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0A7C SAMSUNG
Typical AW019AV-ABA e9250t Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AW019AV-ABA e9250t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback