Monster ABRA A5 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V12.1
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 14:18
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 180
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 350
45% 340 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 4
0% 2.47 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 6
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1456 1060 1498 1155 1120 1152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,038
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,240
348% 1,556 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 312
313% 513 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 228%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 145 152 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 426
Write 371
Mixed 271
SusWrite 179
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 40.2
130% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 338
252% 334 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KVR24S17S8/8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO38ED
Typical ABRA A5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback