Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 141
2-Core 274
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,070
96% 811 Pts
64-Core 2,132
132% 2,132 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 147
Parallax 147
124% 149 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 127
Splatting 112
111% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 1126 1267 1267 1126 972 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,447
Write 1,516
Mixed 1,066
SusWrite 1,144
291% 1,293 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.2
207% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 619
DQ Write 809
DQ Mixed 266
326% 565 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 223%
Great: 255%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2525 2992 3052 3087 2939 2747 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
420% Outstanding
Read 2,724
Write 3,147
Mixed 2,892
SusWrite 2,890
659% 2,913 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 89.4
294% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 828
DQ Mixed 943
710% 956 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 420%
Great: 515%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOY CL18-22-22 D4-3600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 44.7
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 35.3
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 35.8
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 100 27" 1280 720 NIX2717 NX-EDG27
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback