HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89ED
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 16:15
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 205
69% 127 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 460
50% 399 Pts
64-Core 515
32% 515 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89ED) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21018.9001
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 18.2
8% 14.6 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 16.4
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 970 968 1390 1358 1366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 1,152
Mixed 1,353
SusWrite 1,148
290% 1,290 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 40.9
147% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 231
170% 225 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 185%
Great: 488%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 114 113 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 124
Write 104
Mixed 70
SusWrite 113
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A3200C22 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 33 60 31.5" 1280 720 PHLC20E PHL 325E1
Typical Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback