PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200716 |
Uptime | 4.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 08 '24 at 09:33 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | SRB-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
65.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU630 480GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 57 10 63 63 21 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown D12.2756CS.001 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 68 | 54 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | ACR073D VG270 S |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 117x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 83x |
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $120Bench 72%, 52,721 samples | 54x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 50x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 40x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $364 |