Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '24 at 06:59
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	94%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 77.2 1-Core 119 2-Core 232 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 327 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 116 Parallax 110 102% 117 fps	MRender 181 Gravity 114 Splatting 107 106% 134 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 298 290 326 253 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 380 Write 329 Mixed 241 SusWrite 276 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 32.3 119% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 251 217% 320 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 129%
Seagate Constellation CS 3TB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 3TB free Firmware: CN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 148 153 153 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Read 136 Write 146 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 152 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 1x16GB 4,112 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	43.6% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 14 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	24"	1920 1009	ACI24A4 VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,211x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,505x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	727x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	565x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	515x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	436x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $50Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	309x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	298x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16