HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 01:10
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31275
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 129
61% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 394
39% 319 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61
Reflection 64
Parallax 58.2
50% 61.1 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 63
Splatting 59
51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 290 290 311 318 318 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 350
Write 205
Mixed 178
SusWrite 278
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 13.9
70% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 15.4
16% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 16 217 59 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F1C BenQ RL2455
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback