Asrock B760 Pro RS/D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive392% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsrock B760 Pro RS/D4  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760 Pro RS/D4
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 21:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-14500-$234
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 181
2-Core 340
104% 198 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 947
93% 762 Pts
64-Core 1,588
98% 1,588 Pts
Poor: 109%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 118%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 166
Reflection 128
Parallax 153
135% 149 fps
MRender 207
Gravity 132
Splatting 108
117% 149 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2404 2793 3108 2078 1590 1655 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 2,581
Write 2,793
Mixed 2,732
SusWrite 2,272
586% 2,594 MB/s
4K Read 70.9
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 97.1
316% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 994
DQ Mixed 1,128
851% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 392%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 27.9
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1920 1009 GBT2403 G24F 2
Typical B760 Pro RS/D4 Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 244%
UFO

System: Asrock B760 Pro RS/D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback