Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive425% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1600 x 2560 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 17:53
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 54.4
1-Core 180
2-Core 358
100% 198 Pts
4-Core 688
8-Core 1,069
108% 878 Pts
64-Core 1,365
84% 1,365 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$293
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 624331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4519 4456 4445 4431 2798 2516 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
425% Outstanding
Read 4,250
Write 4,630
Mixed 3,360
SusWrite 3,861
907% 4,025 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 6.8
DQ Write 7.4
DQ Mixed 1670
797% 561 MB/s
Poor: 292%
This bench: 425%
Great: 682%
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
340GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 40 18 41 18 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 594
Write 265
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 35.8
50% 232 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 3.4
50% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 99.2
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 16.4
23% 44 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G64D4ZV-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 45.2
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 33.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 49.7
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 4R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
21% 12% 60 217 58 144 0" 1280 720
History: Score 21: 0P 2R 3G 2B | Score 34: 0P 4R 2G 8B | Score 43: 0P 4R 6G 5B
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback