Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive320% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory51.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 15:15
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 345
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,300
118% 990 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 182
Parallax 169
151% 179 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 141
Splatting 122
120% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1833 1821 1797 1841 1854 1877 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 2,170
Write 2,038
Mixed 2,013
SusWrite 1,837
454% 2,014 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 70.3
234% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 1,245
DQ Mixed 1,023
790% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 283%
This bench: 320%
Great: 526%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
3TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 447 446 462 462 462 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 388
Mixed 332
SusWrite 451
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 39.3
123% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 369
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 44 44 44 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 58.2
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 31.3
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 31.3
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical A520M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $193
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback