Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 13:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 87.4
45% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 232
23% 187 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.9
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 14.1
13% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 190 214 234 281 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 333
Write 164
Mixed 228
SusWrite 242
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 23.3
79% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.7
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 39.4
34% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
185GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 64 64 66 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 68.6
Write 71.4
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 63.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS725032A7E630 320GB-$89
45GB free
Firmware: GHBZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 69 69 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 73.3
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 68.2
41% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 3.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 27 60 27" 1280 720 SAM05EC SyncMaster
Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback