Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231225
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 11:03
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 289
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 875
89% 721 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 29.6
18% 23.8 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 21.5
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 43 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
79GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 55 56 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 51
Write 43.1
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 54.8
34% 45.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YX4U3200E18082C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 34.6
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 39.5
SC Mixed 27.7
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 97%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 1R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 25% 16 215 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 HXM2380 MSG242
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback