Acer Aspire A314-42P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A314-42P  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Lindy_LC
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 08:17
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 104
44% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 374
35% 290 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1688) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.16
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
8.98% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 17.6
7% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 10.5
12% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.98%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA512TFK 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 866
Write 1,054
Mixed 841
206% 920 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 21.4
70% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 279
198% 256 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H54G56CYRBX247N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 60 14" 1280 720 CMN1433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback