Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210201
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '24 at 01:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Memory 74.9 1-Core 160 2-Core 314 97% 183 Pts	4-Core 614 8-Core 950 97% 782 Pts	64-Core 1080 67% 1080 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 0595) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Lighting 70.5 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 113 58% 83.9 fps	MRender 53.6 Gravity 74.2 Splatting 40.8 45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c 100 240G 240GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 191 192 189 188 190 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 311 Write 200 Mixed 205 SusWrite 190 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 28.5 118% 45.1 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 130 100% 135 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 361GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 103 104 103 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 92.9 Write 94.2 Mixed 93.1 SusWrite 104 71% 96 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB 1,790 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 27: 0P 2R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
27%	26%	50	217	59	60	7.2"	1280 720	GSM0001 LG TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,674x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,311x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,440x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,256x
RTX 3080Nvidia $435Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,088x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,475x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,849x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $59Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	731x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $118Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	648x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $1,018

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16