Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 SE  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230821
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 17:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 541
54% 440 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.6% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 54.5
Parallax 51
44% 53.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 44.8
42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2SAD01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1445 1305 737 536 221 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,929
Write 1,573
Mixed 1,382
SusWrite 720
313% 1,401 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 51.8
168% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 542
DQ Mixed 618
468% 634 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 202%
Great: 278%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
92GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 65 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 63.5
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 66.4
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 52%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
47GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 91 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 93.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 91.4
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 20.2
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 100 21.5" 1280 720 MSI30B9 MSI MP223
Typical H310CM-HDV/M.2 SE Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV/M.2 SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback