HP Z840 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z840 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2129
Memory500.2 GB free of 512 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230323
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 17:25
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 162
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 638
54% 464 Pts
64-Core 2,567
159% 2,567 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan V
Nvidia(10DE 1218) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1912 MHz, MLim: 425 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 204
Reflection 174
Parallax 247
166% 208 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 222
Splatting 112
138% 177 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 145%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron NX500 NVMe PCIe 800GB-$637
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FM04.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 956 1065 894 889 1084 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 863
Write 1,045
Mixed 575
SusWrite 988
196% 868 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 56.1
4K Mixed 32.4
109% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 432
DQ Mixed 523
392% 528 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 152%
Great: 233%
HP MO003200JWFWR 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: HPD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 477 472 472 478 482 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
HP MO003200JWFWR 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: HPD2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 477 473 472 478 482 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Jmicron Tech 500GB
156GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 385 381 382 386 388 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 364
Write 380
Mixed 321
SusWrite 384
82% 362 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 32.4
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 153
111% 144 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 93%
Toshiba THNSN81Q 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 6103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 441 446 445 444 445 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90% Excellent
Read 452
Write 424
Mixed 367
SusWrite 444
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 32.6
108% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 212
167% 235 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 49.4
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 37.8
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 ACR052F XB271HU A
Typical Z840 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: HP Z840 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback