Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512JP
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 15:12
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 42.6
1-Core 39
2-Core 76.1
32% 52.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 179
19% 153 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.77% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.8
6% 6.7 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 8
Splatting 11.1
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P191202a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 370
Write 201
Mixed 205
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 7.6
50% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 68.9
DQ Mixed 49.2
43% 64 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 107%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 138
Write 72.9
Mixed 68.1
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
268% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Transcend JM2666HSG-8G 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 9 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0046
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_X512JP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback