Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 11:32
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 156
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 400
42% 339 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Zotac(19DA C527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 59
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 52.8
48% 57.9 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 53.4
Splatting 53.6
47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY 250GB SATA SSD 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: W0406B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 105 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 327
Write 204
Mixed 234
SusWrite 105
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 17.7
103% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 20.6
27% 48 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 100%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 104 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 323
Write 208
Mixed 247
SusWrite 104
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 39.2
126% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 52.9
43% 59.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 45: 0P 5R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 52% 29 391 271 60 0.7" 1280 720 VES3700 32W_LCD_TV
Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback