Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime9 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 22:27
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 113
46% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 109
20% 137 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 10.6
5% 7.7 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil R3_256GB 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0411A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 39 34 42 89 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 528
Write 27.7
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 63.8
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 9
54% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 67
DQ Mixed 33.7
58% 120 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
927GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 177 178 178 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 153
Mixed 96.1
SusWrite 175
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.2
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06F8 QG221Q
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback