Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 11:56
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 649
76% 589 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 118
Parallax 135
107% 128 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 108
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 184 177 163 154 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 498
Write 174
Mixed 228
SusWrite 170
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 35.3
150% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 188
167% 256 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 128%
Klevv NEO N400 SSD 240GB
89GB free
Firmware: SBFME1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 152 152 153 85 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 404
Write 250
Mixed 264
SusWrite 167
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 27.8
120% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 170
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
380GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 176 180 178 181 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 113
Write 97.7
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 177
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 114%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
364GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 92 94 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 92.3
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
626GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 28
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 37.4
44% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 30.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 28.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 31 60 31.5" 1280 720 LHC3203 TFX32U06V
Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $363
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback