Colorful H310M-E PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Colorful H310M-E PRO (all builds)
Motherboard	Colorful H310M-E PRO
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '24 at 06:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	25%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 84.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 239 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 576 67% 522 Pts	64-Core 604 37% 604 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70% Good	Lighting 89.9 Reflection 119 Parallax 72.2 73% 93.6 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 85.4 Splatting 78.3 64% 77.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IND-GOW-R240G 240GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0510B SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 113 37 25 43 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 419 Write 185 Mixed 101 SusWrite 60.7 42% 191 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 0.9 54% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 27.8 61% 127 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 370GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 145 146 142 147 144 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 148 Write 135 Mixed 96.5 SusWrite 145 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1G43EB1-CPB 16GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 23.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	50	144	23.6"	1280 720	IPX2300 IP2430

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-E PRO Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

System: Colorful H310M-E PRO

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	11x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	2x
Core i3-6100Intel $66Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	2x

SSD
IND-GOW-R240G 240GBBench 49%, 13 samples	2x
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	1x
520 Series 120GBIntel $199Bench 74%, 19,348 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	4x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	2x
M378A1K43BB2-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GBSamsungBench 76%, 384 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16