HP ProBook 655 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 655 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80FE
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime7 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '24 at 00:03
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A6-8500B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
U4500, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 43.1
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 36.1
25% 35.9 Pts
4-Core 38.5
8-Core 60.9
6% 49.7 Pts
64-Core 59.1
4% 59.1 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 80FE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.01
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.54% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.54%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 211 201 181 195 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 233
Write 214
Mixed 123
SusWrite 207
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 11.4
39% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 84.7
65% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.1
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 45 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15BE
Typical ProBook 655 G2 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 655 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback