| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
| Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110609 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 03 '24 at 20:32 |
| Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.1%
Above average
|
61% 106 Pts
|
40% 304 Pts
|
24% 389 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA 1455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
29% 37.2 fps
|
27% 33.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
43.9%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
39% 13.5 GB/s
|
57% 69.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 41 | 12 | 165 | 27" | 1280 720 | SAM71DC LS27AG32x |
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 685x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 593x |
| Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |