| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130427 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 03 '24 at 18:15 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.2%
Above average
|
47% 72.4 Pts
|
23% 172 Pts
|
11% 175 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
81.7%
Excellent
|
83% 106 fps
|
79% 96.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 125 173 89 46 77 MB/s
|
39.8%
Below average
|
36% 162 MB/s
|
80% 29.1 MB/s
|
14% 33.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.5%
Poor
|
22% 7.6 GB/s
|
18% 6.27 GB/s
|
45% 89.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 57 | 60 | 20.1" | 1680 987 | PHL0861 Philips 220EW |
Typical M5A78L/USB3 Builds (Compare 109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 15x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 14x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 8x |
| GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 6x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $218 |