Asrock A300M-STX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A300M-STX  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '24 at 13:42
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 60.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 201
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 530
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 28.2
16% 21.2 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 14
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 1593 1296 120 945 299 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,858
Write 1,618
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 963
325% 1452 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 38.9
169% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 565
452% 638 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 214%
Great: 352%
Seagate FireCuda 510 SSD ZP1000GM30031 1TB
246GB free
Firmware: STPSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2156 2185 857 766 660 325 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,413
Write 2,085
Mixed 391
SusWrite 1,158
284% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 52.1
168% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 955
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 758
564% 758 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 213%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 28.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 27" 1280 720 DEL427E DELL G2722HS
Typical A300M-STX Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A300M-STX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback