Acer Aspire TC-1780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics83.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-1780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-1780
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 84.8
1-Core 186
2-Core 372
113% 214 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,150
108% 895 Pts
64-Core 1,609
100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.6% Excellent
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 127
Parallax 158
67% 122 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 85.9
Splatting 150
116% 141 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDQNQD-512G-1014 512GB
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101100 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2227 2288 1301 349 276 306 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
316% Outstanding
Read 2,345
Write 2,361
Mixed 1,666
SusWrite 1,124
420% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 62.9
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 79.6
293% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,731
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,307
1,008% 1,390 MB/s
Poor: 217%
This bench: 316%
Great: 480%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 43.5
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 37.9
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 9% 32 213 56 0 72.3" 1280 720 SNY4901 SONY AVAMP
Typical Aspire TC-1780 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-1780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback