TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Laptop 14-cf1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cf1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 852F
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210723
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 21:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 86.7
54% 81.2 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 233
22% 184 Pts
64-Core 235
15% 235 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 52.8%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
HP(103C 852F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.45%
 Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 108 56 90 33 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,326
Write 907
Mixed 843
SusWrite 93.5
176% 792 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 57.1
202% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 208
186% 280 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 135%
 Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 39.1%
 Great: 49%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO403D
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Laptop 14-cf1xxx Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cf1xxx

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples104x
Pentium 5405UIntelBench 48%, 2,193 samples29x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples17x
GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples142x
UHD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 3,878 samples29x
SSD
MZNLN256HAJQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 4,927 samples18x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples15x
WR202I0064G E70245F5 63GBBHTBench 13%, 562 samples15x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples23x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples18x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback