Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700T 7,380 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 40 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 127 44% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 343 36% 288 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 82%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PC SN520 NVMe WDC 128GB 1,325 User benchmarks, average bench 120% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 321 Write 336 Mixed 310 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 21.5 53% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 214 171% 236 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 194%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 100 Write 16.2 Mixed 15.8 39% 44 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.7 41% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MB78HAF-2400 1x8GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	25.9% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 8.3 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 294 14% 294 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	19	14	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	228x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	186x
HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 3%, 14,881 samples	16x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	34x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	17x
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	17x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	35x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	28x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16