Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 141%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 18:10
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$973
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 919
82% 695 Pts
64-Core 2,530
157% 2,530 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 214
Parallax 242
179% 225 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 218
Splatting 175
176% 222 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 1664 1226 1300 698 686 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,902
Write 2,117
Mixed 1,896
SusWrite 1,252
404% 1,792 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 64.4
234% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1018
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 784
599% 820 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 262%
Great: 347%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$81
265GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1937 2062 1471 1391 1366 1355 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 1,915
Mixed 1,626
SusWrite 1,597
403% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 78
263% 93.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 847
643% 873 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 300%
Great: 410%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
345GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1688 1695 1699 842 197 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,877
Write 1,574
Mixed 1,358
SusWrite 1,053
328% 1,466 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 41.9
197% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 650
DQ Mixed 686
555% 794 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 236%
Great: 394%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 73.9
MC Mixed 49.4
163% 57 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 139%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 31 60 42.5" 1280 720 PHLC179 PHL 436M6VBP
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,732 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $784
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback