Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory56.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220523
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 14:35
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$973
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 233
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 860
79% 661 Pts
64-Core 2,482
154% 2,482 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 206
Parallax 260
179% 229 fps
MRender 271
Gravity 218
Splatting 180
178% 223 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$98
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2013
Write 2,319
Mixed 2,016
474% 2,116 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 74
252% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 742
566% 772 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
265GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,455
Write 2,073
Mixed 1,814
470% 2,114 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 86
284% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 790
602% 822 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
345GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,005
Write 1,683
Mixed 1,426
379% 1,705 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 47.1
207% 78.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 686
546% 773 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 402%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$88
67GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 134
Write 138
Mixed 68
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
7GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.1
Write 70.2
Mixed 77.7
57% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 48
MC Write 74.1
MC Mixed 49.3
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 139%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 1R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 9% 95 217 60 60 42.5" 1474 730 PHLC179 PHL 436M6VBP
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback