Alienware x17 R1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware x17 R1  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware x17 R1
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 07:35
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 67
1-Core 156
2-Core 305
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,007
97% 798 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 (Laptop)
Dell(1028 0A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 532.09
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 199
Reflection 193
Parallax 190
162% 194 fps
Gravity 143
Splatting 116
113% 130 fps
Poor: 96% Great: 144%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 1024GB
835GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 36310029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,740
Write 1,320
Mixed 1399
330% 1,486 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 60.1
204% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 750
516% 657 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1E34RCSV1-BD7S 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 34.7
115% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 18.8
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 12% 52 216 58 120 17.2" 1280 720 AUO2892
Typical x17 R1 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware x17 R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback