Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '24 at 02:36
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 193
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 427
48% 376 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.8% Average
Lighting 55
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 51.2
45% 53.4 fps
MRender 62.5
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 45.1
42% 52.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 137 144 144 146 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 425
Write 444
Mixed 289
SusWrite 158
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 53.5
4K Mixed 33
118% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 176
160% 244 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
476GB free
Firmware: MU2OA732
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 117 108 110 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 115
Write 124
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 113
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HUS722T1TALA604 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RAGNWA07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 187 191 188 189 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 218
Mixed 102
SusWrite 190
129% 177 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
363% 3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SRT8G86U1-P9H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5872 E2351
Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback